*LOOK LIKE WYNONA RYDER TOO.
Preacher Claims Alien Tried to Have Sex With Her in Wild TV Interview
Religious author Sharon Gilbert has claimed an "alien" visited her in the form of her husband and asked to have sex with her.
She discussed the encounter in detail while speaking on the Jim Bakker Show, a self-described Christian "prophetic Bible show."
A clip from the show of Gilbert's story was posted on Twitter by writer and Friendly Atheist contributor Hemant Mehta.
End Times preacher Sharon Gilbert says that an alien imitated her husband, and then it tried to have sex with her, and then it claimed to be Xerxes, and then Jesus got involved, and then the alien turned out to be a reptile with a posse of gargoyles. pic.twitter.com/aBqC2IMSqn
— Hemant Mehta (@hemantmehta) November 23, 2021
He posted the video with the caption: "End Times preacher Sharon Gilbert says that an alien imitated her husband, and then it tried to have sex with her.
"Then it claimed to be Xerxes, and then Jesus got involved, and then the alien turned out to be a reptile with a posse of gargoyles."
The video has been viewed over 2.6 million times, with many noting their disbelief in the replies.
Speaking on the show, Gilbert said: "After Derek and I got married this other Derek appears in our bed.
"The real Derek is lying down next to me, other Derek sits right up out of him. It startled me.
"I knew that was not Derek and so I asked this critter, who are you? Because he clearly wanted to have sexual relations.
"He said: 'I am your husband.' I said: 'Who are you?'
"He had the nerve to claim to be, Xerxes. Other Derek seriously wanted to invite me, to use my free will to do something that was going to pull me away from God."
Gilbert went into further detail about the role Jesus played in her defeating the "alien". She also noted that this "other Derek" was joined by other smaller creatures.
She continued: "This last time I knew he was really desperate and I asked him again 'who are you?.' He told me the same answer and I said 'I am not going with you.'
"This was an internal dialogue, finally I said I have had enough, in my mind.
"I reached up, I grabbed his face and I said: 'You are a liar and Jesus is real.' I pulled that face off and beneath it was a reptile.
"He had little creatures with him this time, he brought these little halfling creatures and they looked like, gargoyles and they were very reptilian as well. Beneath the face of Derek was a reptilian serpentine creature."
The hosts then moved the conversation on and it is not clear whether Gilbert meant this story metaphorically or literally.
Many viewers took to mocking Gilbert, with others questioning the validity of the story.
One Twitter user wrote: "It happens. Who among us hasn't pulled their husband's face off to find a horny reptilian?"
Another added: "This is a story a 7-year-old tells when you ask them why they're late for something.
"Also pick a lane, aliens or angels? Make up your mind dammit."
While another person wrote: "I hate it when that happens. It's hard enough to get a good night's sleep and then bloody Xerxes turns up followed by Jesus and reptilian aliens."
Newsweek has reached out to Gilbert for comment.
Preacher: Who Is Sharon Gilbert? Wikipedia Bio, Age ...
Nov 25, 2021 · Sharon Gilbert Age And Religion. The age of the renowned author and preacher Sharon Gilbert is 69 years old. She was born on October 28, 1952, in Southern Indiana, Indiana, United States, and born as a Christian, she was and still is a great devotee of the Christianity religion.
*GOOGLE,NICOLE&SERGEY BRIN ARE CUTTING OFF PARTS OR MOST OF THEE REVELATION 12 LOTR ETC.PICTURE CONFIRMATIONS.
In spite of the fact that it seems more and more fashionable in our day to say that women may be pastors, the Bible is clear that pastoral leadership is restricted to biblically qualified men. This post will examine 1 Timothy 2:12-14, one of the key biblical texts on male-only pastoral leadership, and it will respond to some of the most popular Evangelical Feminist efforts to undermine the teaching of these verses.
The Scriptural Teaching
In 1 Timothy 2:12-14 Paul says:
“I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.”
Paul writes these words in the context of a pastoral epistle. He’s writing Timothy to teach him about pastoral ministry in the church, which means these verses need to be read in that light. They apply to church leadership, specifically to pastoral leadership.
Two Prohibitions
Paul says that women are forbidden to teach or exercise authority over men in the church. It’s important to understand that Paul does not prohibit women from teaching in all contexts (Titus 2:3; Acts 18:25-26), only from teaching the Bible to men in the church.
Notice that Paul prohibits women from doing two distinct things. First, women may not teach the Bible to men in the church. Second, women may not exercise authority over men in the church. Teaching and exercising authority in the church are the two primary responsibilities of elders, pastors, or bishops. Thus, women are not to hold the office of pastor, but neither are they to perform these particular functions of a pastor over men in the church.
A Positive Command
In addition to Paul’s two prohibitions, he gives a positive command to women in the church. He says in verse 12 that women are “to remain quiet.” Paul is not telling women that they may never speak in church at all. Rather, his words must be understood in context. He means that when it comes to teaching and exercising authority over men in the church, women must “remain quiet” (1 Tim 2:12). This is similar to Paul’s teaching in 1 Corinthians 14:34-35, where he says:
“The women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak, but should be in submission, as the law also says. If there is anything they desire to learn, let them ask their husbands at home. For it is shameful for a woman to speak in church.”
Many have misunderstood these verses to say that women shouldn’t speak in church at all. But the context of 1 Corinthians 14 is about speaking in prophetic tongues and the need to interpret them in the worship service of the church. In verses 34-35, Paul is saying that women should not be involved in prophecy or the interpretation of prophecy in the worship service of the church. In these matters, they should “keep silent.” In other words, they are not to be a part of the church’s teaching ministry, nor are they to exercise authority over men, when the church is assembled. Paul is saying the same thing in 1 Corinthians 14 that he says in 1 Timothy 2.
The Two Logical Grounds of the Command
Paul provides two distinct grounds for his command to women to remain quiet when it comes to teaching and exercising authority over men in the church. The word “for” in verse 13 means that if we want to know the reasons Paul is arguing the way he is, we must continue reading.
- The creation order is the first reason Paul gives for prohibiting women from teaching or exercising authority in the church. Paul doesn’t ground his command in cultural considerations or a particular problem with the women in the Ephesian church. Rather, he grounds his command in creation. He says that the reason women are not to teach or exercise authority over men in the church is that, “Adam was formed first, then Eve” (1 Tim 2:13). Paul means that God established Adam as the head and authority of his wife, Eve. God designed men to lead (1 Cor 11:3, 8-9).
- The nature of women is the second reason Paul gives for prohibiting them from teaching or exercising authority in the church. Paul says, “Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor” (1 Tim 2:14). Paul is saying something about the natural constitution of men and women, that men as a class are naturally more fitted to teach and have authority in the church, but women are not. Wayne Grudem says, “This is by far the most common viewpoint in the history of the interpretation of this passage” (Evangelical Feminism & Biblical Truth 70).
But why are women naturally more likely to be deceived than men? It’s true that not all women are more likely to be deceived than all men. And it’s true that some men are more likely to be deceived than some women. But most interpreters in the history of the church have understood this passage to teach that, in general, women are more likely to be deceived than men. In “A History of the Interpretation of 1 Timothy 2,” Dan Doriani says:
“Both sides [feminists and traditionalists] note women tend toward enmeshment, which entails an unwillingness to see and condemn harsh truths about loved ones. Mindful of many individual exceptions to the rule, they [both feminists and traditionalists] sometimes say that women generally have more interest in persons and less interest in detached rational analysis of ideas. But the capacity for detached, critical assessment is absolutely essential for discerning and rooting out heresy, for carrying out discipline in the church. . . . We can also recognize variety in human nature, without labeling anything inferior or superior. In this view, because women generally focus on relationships more than abstract rational analysis, enmeshment in relationships could compromise a woman’s willingness to uproot heresy in the church” (264-265).
Thus, Paul explains that women should not teach the Bible or exercise authority over men in the church for reasons of the creation order and human nature. God created Adam first, and then Eve, establishing Adam as the head and authority over his wife. Also, Eve was deceived by the serpent, not Adam.
Some Evangelical Feminist Objections
Having briefly examined the meaning of the passage, let’s consider a few of the leading Feminist misinterpretations of 1 Timothy 2:12-14. These are mostly drawn from Wayne Grudem’s book, Countering the Claims of Evangelical Feminism, and the page references cited below are from that book.
Women were Teaching False Doctrine (161-167). Some Feminists claim that women were teaching false doctrine in Ephesus, which is why Paul prohibited them from teaching. The Feminists go on to argue that Paul’s command was situational and does not apply to us today. The problem with this view is that the only false teachers named in 1 Timothy are men, Hymenaeus, Alexander, and Philetus (1 Tim 1:19-20; 2:17-18). Another problem with this view is that it makes Paul unjust. It would have been wrong to ban all women from teaching because a few women were teaching false doctrine. Moreover, if Paul banned all women from teaching because some women were teaching heresy, then consistency would demand that Paul also ban all men from teaching because some men were teaching heresy as well (1 Tim 1:19-20).
Women were Not Educated (168-174). Some Feminists argue that Paul forbids women from teaching men in the church in 1 Timothy 2 at Ephesus because they lacked a formal education. The most glaring problem with this view is that the Bible nowhere requires formal education as a prerequisite to teaching in the church. Furthermore, most people in Paul’s day had a basic education, but few men or women had any education beyond that. So, if Paul forbade women from teaching in the church for lack of education, then he would need to forbid men as well.
Wives Shouldn’t Teach or Have Authority Over Their Own Husbands (175-178). Some have argued that Paul is only prohibiting wives from teaching or exercising authority over their own husbands in 1 Timothy 2:12-14. While the Greek words for “man” and “woman” can be translated “husband” and “wife,” that is highly unlikely in this passage for two reasons. First, the context of these verses is a pastoral epistle in which Paul is explaining proper conduct within the churches, not marriages. The passage in question comes just before a discussion of officers in the local church; so, it makes the most sense to take 1 Timothy 2:12-14 as referring to church leadership. Second, when the Greek words for “man” and “woman” are to be translated “husband” and “wife,” context provides clues that indicate such a translation. This passage contains no such clues.
A Temporary Command (179-182). Some Feminists argue that when Paul says, “I do not permit” in 1 Timothy 2:12, he is using a present tense command, which should be understood to mean “I do not now permit.” But this argument misunderstands how Paul uses present tense commands. There are many examples of Paul using present tense commands that are far from temporary. “I urge [present tense] that supplications” (1 Tim 2:1), “I appeal [present tense] to you therefore brothers, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies as a living sacrifice” (Rom 12:1), “I therefore, a prisoner for the Lord, urge [present tense] you to walk in a manner worthy of the calling to which you have been called” (Eph 4:1). Clearly, the present tense of a command does not imply it is temporary.
Nobody Forbids Jewelry or Braids (199-201). Some Feminists argue that most interpreters take Paul’s instructions about jewelry and braids in verses 9-10 as no longer applicable today. Therefore, the Feminists say, we should not take Paul’s instructions in verses 11-14 about women not teaching or having authority over men as applicable today either. The problem with this view is that 1 Timothy 2:9-10 does not prohibit jewelry or braided hair. It says women should not “adorn” themselves with clothing, like jewelry or braids, but with godliness. Paul is warning against women making any of their clothing their adornment (literally kosmos or “world”), rather than godliness and good works. These verses apply just as much today as they did in Paul’s time.
Women Were Not Respected as Religious Leaders. Some Feminists have argued that Paul prohibited women from teaching and exercising authority at Ephesus to accommodate the church to the culture of his day. They argue that women in Paul’s day would not have been accepted as religious teachers; so, in order to avoid offending the men, Paul prohibited women from teaching in order to reach the men of the culture for Christ. A major problem with this view is that women were accepted religious leaders in Paul’s day. Pagan priestesses were common. Another problem is that it suggests that the church should accommodate its practices to false and damaging beliefs of the world.
The overarching problem with all of these Feminist misinterpretations is that they arise from speculation or subjective conjecture and lack any actual support from the text or from the historical background. In addition, all of these misinterpretations ignore the actual grounds Paul himself provides for the command he gives, which involve the fixed realities of the creation order and human nature.
In conclusion, the Bible is clear that only men should be pastors in a local church and only men should perform the duties of teaching the Bible to men and exercising authority over men within the church. The reasons for the Evangelical Feminist interpretations of 1 Timothy 2:12-14 do not arise from the text itself, but from foreign commitments not found within the passage.
For Further Reading
Evangelical Feminism: A New Path to Liberalism? by Wayne Grudem
Countering the Claims of Evangelical Feminism: Biblical Responses to Key Questions by Wayne Grudem
Evangelical Feminism & Biblical Truth: An Analysis of More than 100 Disputed Questions by Wayne Grudem
Biblical Eldership: An Urgent Call to Restore Biblical Church Leadership by Alexander Strauch
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.