Wednesday, March 14, 2018


Prince Harry Meghan Markle engagement: The last time a royal tried to marry a divorced American it sparked a crisis

In 1936 King Edward VIII was faced with a choice to dump 'that woman' or dump the throne
14
Click to follow
The Independent Online
It has been formally announced this 27th day of November in the year 2017 that a British royal - Prince Henry of Wales (known to drinking buddies as Prince Harry) - is marrying an American divorcee.
The last time this happened - in 1936 when King Edward VIII decided to wed American socialite Wallis Simpson - it triggered a crisis inside Windsor Castle.
For one thing, Simpson was about to divorce for the second time. Also, she was from Baltimore.
The King faced a choice: Dump “that woman,” as Simpson became known, or dump the throne.
He dumped the throne.
The extraordinary moment in the history of the monarchy has been recounted in countless books, movies and TV shows - most recently in the hit Netflix series “The Crown,” which dramatizes Queen Elizabeth's rise to the throne.
It goes roughly like this: King Edward falls into forbidden love. King Edward abdicates. His brother George takes the throne. George dies. Elizabeth becomes queen. The End.
What the show, and history, often leave out was how this succession of events - which forever altered succession to the throne - culminated from a truly strange and unlikely love affair.
Simpson was born in Pennsylvania as Bessie Wallis Warfield. Her father was a wealthy flour merchant who died of tubericulosis a few months after she was born. Wallis and her mother moved to a Baltimore row house, living on meager monthly payments from her late father's brother.
It was “cheese-paring poverty,” historian Phillip Ziegler wrote, and Simpson was “resentfully aware that her friends could afford nicer clothes and more lavish holidays.”
Wallis decamped for Florida after her uncle declined to host her coming-out ball, according to Anna Sebba's 2012 biography, “That Woman.” There, in the early 1900s, she met husband number one: Win Spencer, a Navy pilot. They divorced 10 years later. He drank a lot. They fought a lot.
Next up: Ernest Simpson, a Harvard grad who renounced his U.S. citizenship and worked with his father in the British shipping industry, giving Wallis access to high society London. Simpson's New York Times obituary noted that he “ruefully” referred to himself as “The Forgotten Man,” the result of being dumped for a king.
Actually, Edward wasn't just a prince when he first met Wallis at a party in 1931, a year that represented a busy period in which the prince had two other girlfriends. But they didn't have what Wallis possessed: An American accent.
“Those who spoke with an American accent had a much easier chance of amusing the Prince,” Sebba wrote. “He liked almost everything that characterised as new and modern and much of it was American.”
It was not love at first sight, though.
Their courtship took place over a series of years and parties. Wallis became one of Edward's three main squeezes. Then, in 1934, the Prince settled on Wallis as his favourite - or favourite, as the British biographers spell it - dumping the other two.
In deference to the royal family, the British press largely avoided much mention of their relationship, even after George became king when his father died in early 1936.
Wallis was still married to Simpson.
And then, on October 15, 1936, the following headline appeared above an Associated Press story in The Washington Post, setting off chaos in the monarchy: “Path Cleared for ex-Baltimorean, Friend of King Edward, to Gain Freedom; Case Will Be Heard in London October 27.”
“Freedom” meant divorce.
“The actual divorce action,” the AP story said, “under ordinary circumstances, is a mere formality, consisting of only a few minutes testimony.” These circumstances were not ordinary, for the cause of the divorce - adultery - was the king.
Negotiations over the divorce, however, resulted in an agreement between the parties that “under no circumstances,” the AP reported, “will the name of King Edward be mentioned in court, nor will any reference be made to him.”
Their relationship could not be left officially unsaid forever, especially because King Edward wanted to marry the Baltimorean. The king, however, could not reasonably do so. For one thing, he was the head of the Church of England, which did not allow remarriage. And the government would have collapsed over the matter.
So, he abdicated, telling the world in a radio broadcast that:
“A few hours ago I discharged my last duty as king and emperor, and now that I have been succeeded by my brother, the Duke of York, my first words must be to declare my allegiance to him. This I do with all my heart.
“You all know the reasons which have impelled me to renounce the throne. But I want you to understand that in making up my mind I did not forget the country or the empire, which, as Prince of Wales and lately as king, I have for twenty-five years tried to serve.
“But you must believe me when I tell you that I have found it impossible to carry the heavy burden of responsibility and to discharge my duties as king as I would wish to do without the help and support of the woman I love.
“And I want you to know that the decision I have made has been mine and mine alone. This was a thing I had to judge entirely for myself. The other person most nearly concerned has tried up to the last to persuade me to take a different course. I have made this, the most serious decision of my life, only upon the single thought of what would, in the end, be best for all.”
Edward ended his address, “God save the King!”
Only now, the king was a duke.
Washington Post

COMMENTS

1 Comment
shikishinfuni
105 days ago
Also, she was from Baltimore...................So many references to Baltimore. Am I missing something here. Was the UK at war with them or something? And what would have happened if our present Prince William wanted to marry a divorcee from Baltimore, instead of a plain old commoner form the UK. I do not really care, but it was the continual references to Baltimore that intrigued me. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

๐Ÿ›‘⚠️๐ŸŽGORGEOUS, BUT:NOT:SO-PROPER IS:NICOLE SHANAHAN & THERE ARE EVEN WORSE-PICTURES.๐ŸŽ⚠️๐Ÿ›‘

  ©️Nicole Ann Shanahan ■⚠️๐Ÿ›‘๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ”ฅ☠️๐Ÿชฆ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ ■~"MY","MY ","MY", "MY"-HEBREW-SCRIPTURAL-MANDATE, ●IS...