🛫Revelation 12🛫Kimberly Marie Lapointe-Hanson(1971)Ma "kimchirev.12Lotr etc."🛫

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

✡🇮🇱✡EACH KIND(CATAGORY)OF SCRIPTURALLY LEGAL HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT HAS BEEN FULFILLED&THIS CANNOT BE ALTERED.

🛫Kimberly Marie(MARY) Lapointe-HANSON

(1971)Ma

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

"kimchi"REV.12🛫

✡🇮🇱✡EACH KIND(CATAGORY)OF SCRIPTURALLY LEGAL HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT HAS BEEN FULFILLED.

THEY ARE FINAL AND THIS ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

NO-MORE SACRIFICIAL OFFERINGS ARE ALLOWED;ARE ACCEPTABLE ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

THERE IS NO-MORE ROOM FOR ANY KIND OF SCRIPTURALLY LEGAL SACRIFICE.

THIS ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

THE 3 KINDS;CATEGORIES HAVE BEEN FULFILLED.

AND HERE ARE THE 3 KINDS;CATEGORIES ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES:

1. )THE FIRST HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT PERFORMED&WRITTEN INTO ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES WAS&IS:THE ABRAHAMIC COVENANT WITH GOD AND ISRAEL.
THIS POURING FORTH FROM THE BLOOD OF THE CHOSEN AND ACCEPTABLE HEBREW SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS BY: GOD IN THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS CHRIST MY HUSBAND THE HEBREW MESSIAH&THE HOLY GOD OF THE UNIVERSE SEALED ABRAHAM IN AS THE PATRIARCH OF THE HEBREW NATION AND PEOPLE.
THIS SEALED ISRAEL IN ERERNALLY AND THE ISRAELITES;THE HEBREWS;THE JEWS,
OF THE WHICH JESUS CHRIST MY HUSBAND THE HEBREW MESSIAH&I,HIS REVELATION 12🛫 DNA COUSIN AND WIFE QUEEN ARWEN GO TO MY REV.12 ARE.
GOD'S EVERLASTING LOVE;HIS WIFE IS THE PHYSICAL PLACE AND PEOPLE AS I THE PHYSICAL EMBODIMENT OF.
THE PHYSICAL PLACE AND PEOPLE ISRAEL;
MY CHOSEN PEOPLE AND NATION.

2,)THE SECOND HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT PERFORMED&WRITTEN INTO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES WAS&IS: THE SPIRITUAL MARRIAGE OF:JESUS CHRIST THE HEBREW MESSIAH TO HIS:"CHURCH BRIDE"HIS FIRST WIFE"AND"HER" BEING SEALED IN ETERNALLY.
THE HEBREW MESSIAH IS THE SPIRITUAL HUSBAND OF THE TRUE SINLESS BLOOD OF THE LAMB'S (HIS) CHURCH BEING SEALED IN ETERNALLY.
THIS IS:"THE ONLY TRUE CHURCH UPON THE EARTH."
GOD POURED FORTH THE SINLESS BLOOD OF THE ACCEPTABLE CHOSEN HEBREW LAMB OF GOD HIMSELF SEALING IN THESE ETERNAL PROMISES/VOWS.
JESUS CHRIST MY HUSBAND THE HEBREW MESSIAH BY GOD'S HAND AND ALLOWANCE SHED FORTH HIS SACRIFICIAL BLOOD BY HIS AGONIZING UNDESERVED BEATING AND BY THE CROSS AT CALVARY THIS SEALED HIM IN AS THE HEBREW MESSIAH ETERNAL AND THIS ALSO SEALED HIS SPIRITUAL CHURCH BRIDE IN ETERNALLY.

"THE THIRD" AND FINAL HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT IS:"THE SEALING IN ETERNALLY OF THE PHYSICAL; DIVINE MARRIAGE OF GOD THE FATHER AND THE HUSBAND AND JESUS CHRIST THE HEBREW MESSIAH ALSO A HUSBAND: TO A HUMAN WOMAN:TO JESUS CHRIST THE HEBREW MESSIAH'S REAL DNA COUSIN FROM THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
THEIR PHYSICAL BRIDE.
*THE PHYSICAL EMBODIMENT OF ISRAEL AND THE TRUE CHURCH.
THIS IS BOTH OF THE SPIRITUAL AND THE PHYSICAL REALMS.
*AND ALSO TO:JORDAN TAYLOR HANSON GOD HAS SEALED THIS THIRD EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT TO AND WHO IS ALSO OF THE DNA-FAMILY LINE OF JESUS CHRIST THE HEBREW MESSIAH:EMMANUEL AND HE IS:DANIEL;LUCIFER.

THESE EVERLASTING MARRIAHE BLOOD COVENANTS ARE: THE PHYSICAL AND SPIRITUAL REPRESENTATION OF THE HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS.

AND I AM SEALED IN AS THIS PHYSICAL EMBODIMENT OF ISRAEL AND THE TRUE CHURCH.

GOD COULD ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES ONLY HAVE CHOSEN ONE PHYSICAL WOMAN FOR ALL TIME AND SEALED HER IN ETERNALLY AS THE DNA PHYSICAL AND ALSO SPIRITUAL BRIDE AND WIFE OF HIMSELF AS GOD THE FATHER AND THE LORD MESSIAH REDEEMER;THE SINLESS LAMB OF GOD JESUS CHRIST;EMMANUEL THE CHRIST.

AND I AM THIS WOMAN.

THE HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS ARE FINAL.
THE HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS ARE ETERNAL.
THE HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS ARE FULFILLED.
NO UNSEALING OF THE HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS CAN EVER TAKE PLACE ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

ANY OTHER KIND OF POURING FORTH OF BLOOD IN ANY FORMACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES IS;CONTRARY AND IS CALLED:SATANIC AND LUCIFEREAN.
AND ARE NOT SCRIPTURALLY VALID.

THEY ARE NOT FOR,
OF OR ABOUT,
BLESSED BY,
OR SANCTIFIED BY THE GOD OF THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES BEFORE HIS FALL.

THERE ARE NONE OTHER HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS TO BE FULFILLED ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

THIS IS THE ABSOLUTE TRUTH OFTHE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

ALL OF THE HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS FROM THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES ARE HOLY AND ARE POURED FORTH FROM ACCEPTABLE LIVING SACRIFICES.
REAL HEBREW ANIMALS AND SYMBOLIC HEBREW ANIMALS.
THE RECORD IS SEALED.
THERE IS NO-MORE PLACE FOR ANY HOLY LIVING SACRIFICES ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.

SO THE THREE KINDS; CATEGORIES OF HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1.)THE PHYSICAL NATION AND PEOPLE ISRAEL;GOD'S FIRST WIFE;"HIS EVERLASTING LOVE"
"GOD'S ETERNAL:"PHYSICAL PLACE" AND PEOPLE BRIDE"

2.)THE SPIRITUAL BRIDE OF CHRIST JESUS THE HEBREW MESSIAH:"HIS BEING: "THE FINAL SACRIFICE FOR: "SIN" SEALED IN UPON THE CROSS AT CALVARY AND THE SEALING IN BY HIS SINLESS LAMB OF GOD BLOOD "HIS FIRST WIFE"
"THE TRUE CHURCH"
"HIS ETERNAL SPIRITUAL BRIDE"

3.)THIS IS THE FINAL SACRIFICE ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES.
GOD CHOSE A PHYSICAL WOMAN FOR HIMSELF ABD JESUS CHRIST THE HEBREW MESSIAH FROM OF THE DNA FAMILY LINE OF JESUS CHRIST MY HUSBAND THE HEBREW MESSIAH'S DNA FAMILY LINE.
THIS FROM THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL.
THEN GOD POURED FORTH THE EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS FROM THE WOMB AND VAGINA OF THE HEBREW WOMAN THAT HE HAS CHOSEN.
ONE WOMAN FOR ALL TIME.
JESUS CHRIST THE HEBREW MESSIAH AND GOD ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES ARE:"ONE LORD"AND CAN HAVE ONLY ONE DNA PHYSICAL WIFE.
GOD CHOSE ME AND SEALED ME IN ETERNALLY.

THESE SEALINGS IN ARE ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES:ACCEPTABLE AND ACCORDING TO THE HEBREW SCRIPTURES:ETERNAL.
THEY ARE FOREVER SEALED IN WITH NO-SHADOW OF OVERTURNING THEM UNDERANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
NOT EVEN JESUS CHRIST MY HUSBAND THE HEBREW MESSIAH OR GOD CAN CHANGE THEM,
DESTROY THEM,
GIVE THEM AWAY,
(TRANSFER THEM)
RECHOOSE THEM,
REVOW THEM,
REPOUR THEM,
RESEAL THEM.
THEY ARE ETERNAL.
THEY ARE FOREVER SETTLED IN HEAVEN:GOD'S ABODE,

WITH NO SHADOW OF OVERTURNING THEM.
THEY ARE FROM EVERLASTING TO EVERLASTING,

WITH: NO SHADOW OF OVERTURNING THEM.

NO AMOUNT OF WISHFUL THINKING,
NO AMOUNT OF HOPE,
ACCUSING,
BLAMING,
DISLIKING,
SCREAMING AND CRYING,
EVEN BAD BEHAVIOUR CANNOT ALTER ONE WORD,

OF THESE,

EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANTS.
GOD CAN THREATEN AND EVEN TRY TO DIVORCE THEM,

BUT HIS ANGRY WORDS AT ISRAEL AND MYSELF ARE,

NOT ABLE TO EVER ALTER ONE SEALED IN VOW.
SO GET OFF OF US.

AND THOSE WHO LOVE ISRAEL,
THE HEBREW MESSIAH,
THE TRUE CHURCH,
AND ME,THE GREAT-WONDER OF REVELATION 12✡LOTR ETC.

🛫🇮🇱JESUS CHRIST'S;ARAGORN'S REAL DNA HOLY GRAIL,

ISRAELITE PROPHET COUSIN AND WIFE THAT HAS APPEARED,
REJOICE!!!
IN THIS ETERNAL SEALING IN!!!!
JOYFUL IS THE DAY& IS ETERNAL.

PRAISE EMMANUEL!!!
ADORE HIM!!!
GIVE HIM ALL OF THE PRAISE AND HONOR DUE HIS NAME!!!!

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

Earthquakes Ciburial..."*NO.TO ANY:CHRIST IRIS BURIAL IRIS NOAH DOOR NOAH EVE II SION:SAVIOUR IRIS OMEGA NOAH ALPHA:*GOD TOLD U THAT I AM NOT DEAD, *AND THAT I WILL NOT EVER BE DEAD AS WHO IAM ETERNALLY SEALED IN AS. *TIMES EVERY DIRECTION AND EVERY PLACE. *TIMES INFINITY.

&THIS EARTHQUAKE

THAT I JUST POSTED,

COULDN'T BE MORE CLEAR.

*GOD TOLD NICOLE BRIN,

&AMANDA ROSENBERG,

&ALL OTHER CHINESE

WOMEN,&THEIR

DESCENDANTS,

CLEARLY,

THAT

THEY

ARE NOT ,

ANYONE

THAT,

THE

'REVE

LATION 12,

LOTR

ETC.

'CLIFF'S EDGE"

IS ANYTHING

ABOUT,

OR FOR.

&THIS IS

THE FINAL

ANSWER.

🛫

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

*whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

*(THIS IS NICOLE BRIN.)

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

*whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

*whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

*whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

*Io Recognised by Her Father: by Victor Honoré Janssens (second half of 17th century)

*The Bible Forbids Mixing of Races! Interracial Marriage and Interracial Dating is Forbidden!

&THIS EARTHQUAKE

THAT I JUST POSTED,

COULDN'T BE MORE CLEAR.

*GOD TOLD NICOLE BRIN,

&AMANDA ROSENBERG,

&ALL OTHER CHINESE

WOMEN,&THEIR

DESCENDANTS,

CLEARLY,

THAT

THEY

ARE NOT ,

ANYONE

THAT,

THE

'REVE

LATION 12,

LOTR

ETC.

'CLIFF'S EDGE"

IS ANYTHING

ABOUT,

OR FOR.

&THIS IS

THE FINAL

ANSWER.

Madison’s version of the speech and press clauses, introduced in the House of Representatives on June 8, 1789, provided: “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.”376 The special committee rewrote the language to some extent, adding other provisions from Madison’s draft, to make it read: “The freedom of speech and of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to apply to the government for redress of grievances, shall not be infringed.”377 In this form it went to the Senate, which rewrote it to read: “That Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and consult for their common good, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”378 Subsequently, the religion clauses and these clauses were combined by the Senate.379 The final language was agreed upon in conference.

Cornell Law School

First Amendment

The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition. It forbids Congress from both promoting one religion over others and also restricting an individual’s religious practices. It guarantees freedom of expression by prohibiting Congress from restricting the press or the rights of individuals to speak freely. It also guarantees the right of citizens to assemble peaceably and to petition their government.

Learn more...

Primary tabs

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

*PEOPLE CALL EXPOSING THE UGLY TRUTH,

ATTACKING PAYGONITE CHURCHES,THE SOCIAL MEDIAS,

THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY,

POLITICIANS&'THE ROYAL WANNA-BEES"&MILITARY....."

&ANY PERSON WHO CANNOT HANDLE BEING,

TOLD ON FOR THEIR GUILT.

*&WHAT A GODDAMNED VICIOUS LYING HYPOCRITE SUNDAR IS.

*HE SHOULD BE BLOCLED.

*I TOLD U TO ARREST HIM&ALL OF HIS HELLPERS.

&NOT GIVE HIM ANY RIGHTS OR WRITES.

&HE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO RECEIVE AN IN THIS NATION.

Freedom Of Press: A Guaranteed Right? | Forbes India Blog

https://www.forbesindia.com/blog/economy-policy/...

Jun 13, 2018 · The freedom of speech and expression is of paramount

importance and the Press is undoubtedly the most powerful watchdog of public interest. A free press …

*ACLU

KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: WHAT TO DO IF YOU ARE DETAINED FOR TAKING PHOTOGRAPHS

Taking photographs and video of things that are plainly visible in public spaces is a constitutional right—and that includes transportation facilities, the outside of federal buildings, and police and other government officials carrying out their duties.

Unfortunately, law enforcement officers have been known to ask people to stop taking photographs of public places. Those who fail to comply have sometimes been harassed, detained, and arrested. Other people have ended up in FBI databases for taking innocuous photographs of public places.

The right of citizens to record the police is a critical check and balance. It creates an independent record of what took place in a particular incident, one that is free from accusations of bias, lying, or faulty memory. It is no accident that some of the most high-profile cases of police misconduct have involved video and audio records.

Relatedly, artistic expression should never be chilled out of fear of unwarranted police scrutiny. No one should ever find an FBI agent on their doorstep just because they photographed public art.

Through litigation, public education, and other forms of advocacy, the ACLU has defended the rights of photographers and all camera-wielding individuals to document freely.

SEARCH PHOTOGRAPHERS' RIGHTS

ALL PHOTOGRAPHERS' RIGHTS

GOVERNMENT AND GOVERNANCE, NATIONAL SECURITY, ARTS, CULTURE & SOCIETY | AUSTRALIA

11 JUNE 2019

While debates around freedom and security are crucial to democracy, there are bigger issues around the role and behaviour of Australia’s government at stake, James Mortensen writes.

Over the last couple of weeks, the eyes of both national and international journalists have been firmly set on Australia. The latest string of raids cements the government’s newfound reputation for absolute information control, especially when the information in question impacts national security.

Tighter restrictions on whistleblowing, journalism, and public statements made by government employees have been rolled out over the past five years, with the resultant prosecutions usually justified by concerns for national security.

Beyond the inevitable scrutiny from domestic journalists, it’s worth noting that this trend has made headlines overseas. High profile international media outlets have taken a keen interest in the government’s recent behaviour.

The New York Times suggested that the raids were the latest acts of a government that “seems determined to frighten whistle-blowers into silence,” while the BBC and Washington Post both reported that the government’s actions demonstrated a lack of whistle-blower protection and raised questions around press freedom.

The unfolding events in Australia have captured the world’s imagination as they represent the front lines of the battle between freedom and security – especially the freedom of the press.

But this ideological battle helps very little in reaching an understanding, especially considering that the argument rests on pitching the two pillars of liberal democracy against each other.

While arguments regarding the realisation of these ideals are crucial to our democracy, in any given moment, Australians want and deserve as much of both as they can get. Arguably, it is the responsibility of every citizen and their representative governments to ensure that this happens.

It is crucial, therefore, that we strive for both freedom and security at all points, and if they are mutually exclusive, resist the urge to retreat to a rhetorical battleground in which the two are pitted against each other.

Not only does the allure of rhetoric polarise our discourse and hamper our chances of enjoying both, but it also distracts us from the more nuanced issues at stake in moments of decision. This is certainly the case today; while journalists and politicians argue over freedom and security, there is a more concerning argument sitting below the surface.

Beyond these raids and prosecutions sits a basic proposition: the Australian Government should decide the public interest. Journalists and whistle-blowers argue that the information they seek to report on is vital to the Australian people.

However, not only does the government disagree with this, but it also believes that the release of such information harms the interests of the nation. By prosecuting individuals and institutions on this view, the government is not simply limiting the capacity of the press, but it also claims the right to decide the public interest.

There is a strong argument to support the idea that the government has the greatest capacity and responsibility to determine and manage the public interest. As the keeper of secrets and classified information, it is easy to argue that it is best positioned to judge the impact of sensitive information, and as the ordained protector of the people, it has the most to lose by their insecurity.

There are, however, strong arguments to the contrary. The government – or the individuals that constitute it – has the most to lose from the dissemination of such information. As such, it is hard to trust that instances of harsh punishment for those who bring light to events that involve the abuse of power are not simply attempts by politicians and bureaucrats to save their own skins.

Further, the quality and authority of a government is severely hampered if the people who have elected it are unaware of its actions and capabilities. The more control a government has over information in the public space, the less democratic authority it can enjoy.

Lastly, and most simply, believers in self-determination would argue that the only legitimate interest a country’s people can have is one they choose for themselves. If the government, on the other hand, stands separate from the public – which Australia’s current government seems to believe it does – then it can no longer make a legitimate judgement on what the public interest is.

While arguments over control of the public interest may be as irreconcilable as debating freedom and security, it holds the great benefit of practicality.

Instead of attempting to pit two absolute ideals against each other, we can instead ask specific and practicable questions. Who should determine what is or isn’t in the public interest? Can the government be trusted to regulate what its people know about it? Can the media, researchers, and public servants be trusted to determine that interest without adversely affecting the government’s capacity to secure the people?

The gravity and intensity of recent events, evidenced by the wide international scrutiny they have received, demand a thoughtful and convincing response. Australia needs to turn from the temptation to play tug-of-war with the concepts of security and freedom, instead examining more practical questions.

This is the case considering the pace and reach of government efforts to control public discourse moving forward. Not only that, but it has been punishing ‘breaches’ long forgotten – an ironic effort considering the Liberal government’s own tendency to lose classified information to second-hand shops, and the responsible and measured reaction of the public and journalists who uncovered it.

Join the APP Society

One Response

Godfree Roberts
JUNE 12, 2019
An alarmingly low number of Americans say they trust the media. Over the last two decades, research shows the public has grown increasingly skeptical of the news industry. The Media Insight Project, a collaboration of the American Press Institute and the Associated Press‑NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, helps establish that trust is an important differentiator for building an audience. By late 2018, says the American Press Institute, ”Just six percent of Americans say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress and well below the public’s view of other institutions.” https://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/trust-news/ Nobody trusts our ‘free’ media. Everybody trusts government media. End of story.
Show more

Earthquakes in Dunnigan, California, United States - Most ...

https://earthquaketrack.com/us-ca-dunnigan/recent

Dunnigan has had: (M1.5 or greater) 2 earthquakes in the past 24 hours 7 earthquakes in the past 7 days; 54 earthquakes in the past 30 days; 782 earthquakes in the past 365 days

Dunnigan, CA Earthquakes | Homefacts

https://www.homefacts.com/earthquakes/California/Yolo-County/Dunnigan.html

Earthquake Information for Dunnigan, California. Dunnigan, CA has a high earthquake risk, with a total of 364 earthquakes since 1931. The USGS database shows that there is a 75.32% chance of a major earthquake within 50km of Dunnigan, CA within the next 50 years. The largest earthquake within 30 miles of Dunnigan, CA was a 4.4 Magnitude in 1978.

1.8 magnitude earthquake:Dunnigan, California, United ...

https://earthquaketrack.com/quakes/2019-08-17-23-50-32-utc-1-8-13

Aug 17, 2019 · 1.8 magnitude earthquake 2019-08-17 23:50:32 UTC at 23:50 August 17, 2019 UTC Location: Epicenter at 38.861, -122.21 21.2 km from Dunnigan (13.2 miles)

Location: M 1.8 - 21km W of Dunnigan, CA

&NICOLE BRIN IS NOT IN ANY WAY A: "DUCK",

*IN THIS OR AT ALL.

*GOD WAS BEING A SMART-ASS.

*NO.NICOLE BRIN AS A DUCK,

OR WITH A DUCK.

*NO.NICOLE NOAH II..."

*FINAL ANSWER.

🛫Revelation 12🛫(Mel-Sarah-Kimberly Marie Lapointe-Christ(H)(1971)Ma "kimchirev.12Lotr etc."🛫

Thursday, March 11, 2021

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION—SPEECH AND PRESS&First Amendment

✡🇮🇱✡EACH KIND(CATAGORY)OF SCRIPTURALLY LEGAL HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT HAS BEEN FULFILLED&THIS CANNOT BE ALTERED.

✡🇮🇱✡EACH KIND(CATAGORY)OF SCRIPTURALLY LEGAL HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT HAS BEEN FULFILLED&THIS CANNOT BE ALTERED.

✡🇮🇱✡EACH KIND(CATAGORY)OF SCRIPTURALLY LEGAL HEBREW EVERLASTING MARRIAGE BLOOD COVENANT HAS BEEN FULFILLED&THIS CANNOT BE ALTERED.

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION—SPEECH AND PRESS

Adoption and the Common Law Background

First Amendment

Primary tabs

Amendment I

Freedom Of Press: A Guaranteed Right? | Forbes India Blog

SEARCH PHOTOGRAPHERS' RIGHTS

One Response

Earthquakes in Dunnigan, California, United States - Most ...

Dunnigan, CA Earthquakes | Homefacts

1.8 magnitude earthquake:Dunnigan, California, United ...

2.5 magnitude earthquake:Dunnigan, California, United ...

1.7 magnitude earthquake:Dunnigan, California, United ...

Magnitude 2.0 Earthquake:Dunnigan, CA on 07-26-2017 ...

No comments:

Post a Comment

~Relaxing Christmas Carol Music | 8 Hours | Quiet and Comfortable Instrumental~...

Report Abuse